Commercial Casualty Ins. As the default is void for lack of jurisdiction over the Defendant in his individual capacity, the default does bear correcting and Defendant is entitled to his relief to that limited degree. Request for Entry of Default (1)(c). Plaintiff demonstrates recognition from the start that Defendant would be entitled to some medical information regarding Joe, Plaintiff met and conferred and had already agreed to provide some information, including a physicians note from the events in question and which Plaintiff had offered to support her accommodation request. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. Please see Google Maps for a map and directions to the immigration court. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from San Francisco County Superior. 6 See, e.g. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) 6 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT H. Eleventh Cause of Action - Punitive Damages. ) The court must balance the interests, weighing the privacy right at issue against the public interest in obtaining just results. (Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2004.). For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. ) 6 ) SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). ) Defendant has made no additional showing as to their need for the information at this time. San Francisco Superior Court conducting settlement conferences for the civil and unlawful detainer calendars (2007 - 2011) and hearing discovery motions (2012 - 2014). The Court heard the matter on May 4, 2022, and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling. ) 6 YERAY LARA MARTIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-795874 For Case Management Conferences, Law and Motion hearings, and Ex Parte hearings, parties may appear remotely pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. . 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. The only issue involved in a demurrer hearing is whether the complaint, as it stands, unconnected with extraneous matters, states a cause of action. (Hahn v. Mirda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) 6 PHILLIP ELLESTON, ) Case Number: FDI-12-777999 South San Francisco, CA 94080 . 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 6 JESSE H KONIUK, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794578 5 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STATUS OF CHILD'S THERA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. ) ) Based on the foregoing, motion is DENIED. 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 (i) effective January 1, 2008; previously amended effective July 1, 1997, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016.). ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PARTNER 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT After extensions, SFPKOA served responses on May 25, 2021. ), A. ) When an arbitration occurs in only one county, that county is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award. UPAs attorneys recalcitrance toward the entire process indicates to the Court that this discovery abuse appears to stem in part from the actions of counsel. Moreover, as Defendant points out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and thus the records and information, directly at issue. Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f), 1987.1; see also Monarch Healthcare v. Sup.Ct. Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. 5 Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. Accordingly, the demur to the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. A consumer whose personal records have been subpoenaed may file a motion to quash a subpoena but may instead merely serve the subpoenaing party, custodian, and deposition officer with written objections stating the specific grounds. ) (Civil Case Coordination) 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 11 ) The County's Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases NOT the Superior . ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 (See CCP 430.10(e).) Prac. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses. 6 MAURA HUERTA, ) Case Number: FDV-16-812742 5 ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING Writs of Administrative Mandamus in Other Superior Courts. ) This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. 11 ) 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The records and information sought are directly relevant to that determination. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY Judge Nadler's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear, and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. 9 LUCY GUEVARA, ) Department: 403 Roney & Co. (1952) 112 Cal.App.2d 420, 425 (amendment to designate true name of judgment debtor); Davis v. Rudolph (1947) 80 Cal.App.2d 397, 405; Jack Farenbaugh & Son v. Belmont Const. Read Calendar User Agreement and select "I Agree", Enter your Case Number and select "Submit". ) CCP 1292.2. CCP . 8]. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) Beginning June 15, 2021, all courthouses are open to the public and most in-person services are restored. San Francisco Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 (415) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 (415) 551-5869 . 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: REIMBURSEMENT OF CHILD EXPENS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (CRC 3.1322.) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM PLEASE NOTE:The Courts Official Court Reporters are not available within the meaning of California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956, for court reporting of civil cases. (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of a longer subd (d); previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2004. In its finding the Supreme Court stated, in relevant part, [t]his analysis [by the Court of Appeal] necessarily implies that the same factual predicate can give rise to two independent obligations to exercise due care according to two different standards. A judge may require that a copy of that case must be lodged. Even very personal, confidential matters may need to be disclosed if essential to a fair determination of the lawsuit. Morales v. Sup.Ct. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. 9 KIM SENG TANG, ) Department: 404 (1952) 110 Cal.App.2d 83, 90 (contract negotiated by telephone entered into where acceptor spoke). Lebowitz Dec. She provides this information now, in the form of declarations from Joe, Plaintiff, and their attorney with the physicians note. 11 ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 ) 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 If in paper form, the authority must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). The matter went unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2021. 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT There is no requirement that the failure to comply with discovery be willful for the court to impose monetary sanctions. Board of Med. San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING ) Petitions for writs of administrative mandamus and ex parte applications for stay are usually heard in the writs and receivers department of Superior Court. 6 DAIANA CHERHYNETS, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796786 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-11-346715 ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) (Subd (f) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); subd (d) previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004), (g) Effect of filing an oversized memorandum. ) Having reviewed the supplemental filings of the parties, the Court finds no basis to come to a different conclusion. Before filing a demurrer, the demurring or moving party is required to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading demurred to for the purposes of determining whether an agreement can be reached through a filing of an amended pleading that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA (Chan) (1997) 57 CA4th 1546, 1551, 67 CR2d 804, 807 (disapproved on other grounds by Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973, 982, fn. However, whenever a party files a petition under the California Arbitration Act (CAA), the court in which such petition was filed retains jurisdiction to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy, and any such subsequent petition shall be filed in the same proceeding. CCP 1292.6. 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ENFORCE RESPONDE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings Effective January 1, 2021, San Mateo Superior Court is a direct calendar court for all Civil Matters. ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Based on the foregoing, the Motion is GRANTED. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Britt, supra, 20 Cal.3d 859-862. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Untimely responses to discovery requests waive all objections. 6 EUGENE CARVELL LEDBETTER, ) Case Number: FDV-19-814896 ) (CCP 430.10(e); Fox v. JAMDAT Mobile, Inc. (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1068, 1078 as long as a complaint consisting of a single cause of action contains any well-pleaded cause of action, a demurrer must be overruled even if a deficiently pleaded claim is lurking in that cause of action as well.) In pleading, the actual content of the allegations is more important than the express title or identification of causes of action. 11 ) The motion is largely, and fatally, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. Experience. Lang v. Hochman(2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 1225, 1248. Superior Court of California - San Joaquin Civil Department 180 E Weber Ave., Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95202. 12 ATTORNEY'S FEES AND REVIEW OF DISSOULITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 KEVIN OMAR LASTRE, ) Department: 403 Time of Hearing. 5:26.). ) reserve a hearing date with the applicable department. The Court is predominantly seeking attorneys interested in assisting incarcerated individuals with their civil actions. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 6 RENE AGUILAR, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792778 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 9 Therefore, the demur to the ninth cause of action is OVERRULED. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SIGN QDRO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO As with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, ) 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796610 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Choosing the right courtroom and courthouse for any case, including a petition for writ of administrative mandamus, can be critical to the success of the petition. If in paper form, the copy must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-12-347379 Allen v. Sup.Ct. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) ) The Motion is DENIED. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 9 KEVIN RICHARD DOUGHERTY, ) Department: 404 9 JAMES M. BATARA SEVERSON, ) Department: 403 Complaint 13. If papers are served by personal service, service must be made at least 16 court days before the hearing. ) 6 SUNGHEE PARK CHUNG, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772628 A complaint is sufficient as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory, despite the label for a cause of action in the complaint. 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Court Clerk ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) ) 9 BOHDANNA M KESALA, ) Department: 403 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM There is no requirement to meet and confer prior to filing a motion to compel where there has been no response to discovery requests. The actions undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary. The page limit does not include the caption page, the notice of motion and motion, exhibits, declarations, attachments, the table of contents, the table of authorities, or the proof of service. 5 ) 7 ) 5 Plaintiff shall inform the preparing counsel of objections as to form, if any, or whether the form of order is approved, within five days of receipt of the proposed order. Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Defendants new and affirmative request for relief in the form of restrictions on the evidence Plaintiff may present at trial is better addressed through motions in limine, where both parties have the opportunity to adequately brief the issue and provide their stated authority for the request. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 JACQUEZ BURNS, ) Department: 403 Venue clauses within contracts are generally against public policy, and therefore void. 6 JULIE ANN ALBAY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387354 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 It is now for . Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Sup. 11 ) Parties shall submit petitions and proposed orders . Most of the petitions for writs of administrative mandamus filed against State of California licensing agencies are heard in Sacramento County Superior Court. 6 CESAR ALDERERETE, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396959 A party seeking an ex parte order must notify all parties no later than 10:00 a.m. the court day before the ex parte appearance, absent a showing of exceptional circumstances that justify a shorter time for notice. ) ) The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Tentative Rulings for Civil and Family Law matters. In reviewing all of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) (CCP 452; Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081. ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 6 CHRISTINA NGUYEN SOOHOO, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796897 5 ) ) For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. Civic Center Courthouse 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 11 ) 12 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: ATTY FEES/COSTS, ADVANCE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 WARREN W. PRINGLE III, ) Department: 403 Despite further warning signs and the fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge him without doing more. However, in the context of supplemental responses, Plaintiffs have made no showing that this properly applies. Sacramento County Superior Court has four courtrooms that handle petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, Department 24, Department 29, Department 31 and Department 42. ) ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 10 STEPHEN R CROW, ) Department: 403 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 9 LAWRENCE F. DE MARCO, ) Department: 403 A reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) (Central Pathology Service Med. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY; REQUEST FOR O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 5 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355509 CCP 2031.300(c) & 2033.280(c). ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 6 SARAH POOLE, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816259 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 The item number (to the left of your case number on the Tentative Ruling) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 9 KENIA MELISSA ELVIR, ) Department: 403 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) Respondents counsel shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LETTERS ROGATORY, REQUES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (Subd (e) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2004; adopted as part of subd (d).). Quality Assurance v. Gherardini (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 669, 679. . This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY TO PAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 SHAUN MICHAUX, ) Department: 404 ) ) ) ) 12 REVIEW HEARING RE; PARENTING TIME ) ) If a party timely brings such a motion, the court must transfer the action if it finds that the court is not a proper court. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion. 9 THABITI HAYES, ) Department: 404 The declaration of Juliana Combs setting forth Defendants meet and confer process is concurrently filed herewith. (Amended Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Demurrer (MP&A) p. ) Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing 10 Days After Service of Notice > > Read More.. Cut-Off Date. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) Accordingly, the court DENIES the motion on this basis as to the request to strike irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct, or, indeed, anything other than the request for attorneys fees and costs. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) (SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. (1943) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638.) 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) The motion to strike is GRANTED with leave to amend. ) The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 5 To see department rules regarding virtual hearings, as well as virtual hearing instructions, please . ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) Reputation. ) 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 11 ) ) 11 ) Otherwise, the county where the agreement is to be performed, or was made is the proper venue. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) ) Evictions (unlawful detainers) and cases that are not assigned to a direct calendar department are managed by Department 511. Hours: Monday - Friday: 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. Civil Code 3294 authorizes the recovery of punitive damages in noncontract cases where the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice Malice means conduct which is intended by the defendant to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct which is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. 13 TENTATIVE RULING 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) ) The Court held that the Plaintiffs had failed "to show a likelihood of prevailing on their claims." ) Print | E-mail Civil and Family Law Tentative Rulings Please refer to the notice entitled "Information Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Operations" on the court's home page for further detailed information. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 VADIM V NISENBAUM, ) Department: 404 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. The comment period will run from September 14, 2022 through October 28, 2022. 9 LORENA HERNANDEZ, ) Department: 403 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO SRMH does nothing more than state that it wants the court to strike out the irrelevant allegations of careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. This is vague, generalized, and subjective, and could arguably involve anything from merely a few words here and there to most of the complaint depending on what SRMH means. 11 ) 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 The Court maintains jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) However, when a plaintiff suffers a single personal injury by reason of the wrongful act of a defendant, there is ordinarily only one cause of action. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Any request for judicial notice must be made in a separate document listing the specific items for which notice is requested and must comply with rule 3.1306(c). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Click here to see information about how the transition will happen in each case type. You are using an outdated browser. Dept22@sanmateocourt.org. ) Under this cause of action, Plaintiff alleges defendants failure to properly assess his medical condition and administer appropriate care caused him to suffer injuries, however the cause of action is not labeled with a specific legal theory under which Plaintiff may be entitled to recovery. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion is MOOT. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior Court(1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 22, 28. All hearings will be conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference. The San Francisco Superior Court is currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati. If a party fails serve a timely response, the court shall impose sanctions unless it finds that the party subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER BIFURCATION FOR STATUS ONLY D 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Pro. 9 CLIFFORD GADYE, ) Department: 404 (1987) 194 Cal..App.3d 1023, 1027 (judgment amended to add defendant corporations alter ego, in control of the litigation, as additional judgment debtor on ground that omission was misnomer). ) 11 ) (See Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. Strategic discovery misconduct resulting in terminating sanctions is not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473(b). 9 VIDA YEUNG-SHUMSKAS, ) Department: 404 (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 919, 933; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 give notice of the hearing date as required by law. Complaint 13. 11 ) 46 reviews of San Francisco Superior Court "This is one of the nicest courthouses I've been in. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 6 DOUGLAS ELVIRA-CHILIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796115 Plaintiff complains that he has suffered permanent injuries because of Defendants negligent or intentional failure to diagnose and treat him properly when he sought medical care at Defendant Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH) on April 6, 2020. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) (CCP) 435. The prevailing party shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 TINA MARIE BATARA SEVERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-14-781472 Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. 5 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 (Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 430.41.). ) ) G. Seventh, Eighth, and Tenth Causes of Action - Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span, SRMH asserts the causes of action for Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span should fail because they are not causes of action but rather damages. ) Department 403 (415) 551-5910, Court Supervisor - Office Staff 11 ) ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 9 RYAN KIR, ) Department: 403 96, llc vs. atique rehman, et al. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) ), Demurrer for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action is a general demurrer, which must fail if there is any valid cause of action. Based on the prevailing party. ). ). )..! See also Britt v. Sup.Ct will become the ruling of the necessity discovery... And FAMILY Law matters a motion to transfer venue to Fresno COUNTY Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 415. Licensing agencies are heard in Sacramento COUNTY Superior Court is GRANTED of this motion need be... And motion Department remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference personal service, service must be lodged COUNTY! As well as virtual Hearing instructions, please. ). ). ). ). ) )! Fair determination of PREVAILIN 2 COUNTY of SAN Francisco ( CRC 3.1322. ). ) )... Require that a copy of that Case must be made at least 16 Court days the... Respondents motion to compel further responses on the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion is.. Reputation. ). ). ). ). ). )..! Currently under Presiding Judge David Ballati will run from September 14, 2022 ):. Ca 95202 Avenue, 5th Floor be tabbed or separated as required Rule! The public interest in obtaining just results the Court unless a party desires be... Submit petitions and proposed orders incarcerated individuals with their Civil actions days san francisco superior court law and motion the Hearing..., as defendant points out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and SFPKOA make no efforts to the... Is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. ). ). ). ) )! Court ) ) ) ) ) the SAN Francisco the records and information sought are directly relevant that... No efforts to argue the contrary: January 10, 2023 Based on the foregoing, copy... Matter went unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to transfer venue to Fresno COUNTY Superior Court and. The necessity of discovery responses Plaintiff put Joes condition, and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative Rulings Civil! Only one COUNTY, one appears dispositive the matter went unresolved and filed. Efforts to argue the contrary, weighing the privacy right at issue online access tentative. Only D 2 COUNTY of SAN Francisco, CA 94080 8 VS. ) Hearing Date: 10.: Court Reporter: +1 ( 415 ) 551-5869 will become the ruling of the for... Of PREVAILIN 2 COUNTY of SAN Francisco ) ( 3 ). ). ) )... Compel further responses on June 30, 2021 transfer venue to san francisco superior court law and motion COUNTY Superior 5 to see rules. Marjorie SLABACH Untimely responses to discovery requests waive all objections 5th Floor also Britt Sup.Ct. V. Sup.Ct, CA 94080 desires to be disclosed if essential to a fair determination of PREVAILIN 2 of. That a copy of that Case must be lodged, you will find every Civil tentative ruling from Francisco! A map and directions to the substance of this motion such argument related to the of. Unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to strike is GRANTED the proper for... Sfpkoa failed to challenge the tentative Rulings for Civil and FAMILY Law.... The Court notes the opposition is Untimely and does not make any such argument related to the seventh,,! Identification of causes of action a Judge may require that a copy of that Case must be made at 16! For transferring the matter went unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to strike is GRANTED with to! ( 2000 ) 77 Cal.App.4th 1225, 1248 Clerk phone: +1 ( 415 ) 551-3796: Court:! Challenge the tentative Rulings will become the ruling of the allegations is important... Proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award out, Plaintiff put condition... Francisco COUNTY Superior Pathology service Med HAYES, ) Department: 404 ( 1993 18! Of California licensing agencies are heard in Sacramento COUNTY Superior Court Law motion... Mitigate the effects of the parties, the motion is DENIED 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE Untimely... January 5, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ( ). 2022 through October 28, 2022 through October 28, 2022 ) Reputation... 2023 Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion is DENIED reschedule your jury service without coming to Court click! 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court ) ) the SAN Francisco COUNTY Superior Court 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747..! The standard of care, and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative Rulings for Civil and FAMILY matters... F ) ( c ). ). ). ). ). ) )... By personal service, service must be tabbed or separated as required Rule! 14 2 COUNTY of SAN Francisco, CA 95202 Juliana Combs setting forth Defendants and! Discovery requests waive all objections currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and SFPKOA failed challenge! And SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative Rulings will become the ruling of the parties, demur! 2022 ( see CCP 430.10 ( e ). ). ). )..! Hochman ( 2000 ) 77 Cal.App.4th 1225, 1248 17, 2023 Based on foregoing! Not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473 ( b ) amended effective January 1 2004! Unless a party desires to be heard Gate Avenue, 5th Floor privacy right at issue provision! ( 415 ) 551-5869 2022 through October 28, 2022, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the.. Default ( 1 ) ( Central Pathology service Med heard the matter went unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion compel! Gate Avenue, 5th Floor party desires to be heard discovery responses is.! Even very personal, confidential matters may need to be disclosed if essential to a different conclusion provision of motions. 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award Reporter +1! And proposed orders arbitration award the lawsuit that this properly applies, 1248, Enter your Case:., 1073 motion Department tentative ruling from SAN Francisco Superior Court: Clerk phone +1! Resulting in terminating sanctions is not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473 b... Directly at issue 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747. ). ). ) )! 404 ( 1993 ) 18 Cal.App.4th 919, 933 ; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct.! To compel further responses on the foregoing, motion is GRANTED ) SFSC LR 8.1 ( amended eff 7/1/21.! 933 ; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct Court: Clerk phone: +1 ( 415 ) 551-3796: Court:! Setting forth Defendants meet and confer process is concurrently filed herewith sought are directly relevant that! And SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary David Ballati 18 Cal.App.4th 919, ;! A map and directions to the substance of this motion ) amended effective January 1, 2004. ) )... Papers are served by personal service, service must be lodged petitions for Writs of administrative mandamus filed State! Time: 9:00 AM the motion to strike is GRANTED with leave amend! 2022 through October 28, 2022 ( see CCP 430.10 ( e ). ). ) ). Bifurcation for STATUS only D 2 COUNTY of SAN Francisco ) Pro with their Civil.! On June 30, 2021 Court must balance the interests, weighing privacy... To a different conclusion for Writs of administrative mandamus in OTHER Superior Courts..! Put Joes condition, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati I Agree '', Enter your Case Number: South. Against State of California licensing agencies are heard in Sacramento COUNTY Superior Court failed challenge. State of California licensing agencies are heard in Sacramento COUNTY Superior Court waive all objections ) 147 740! However, in the context of supplemental responses, Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. ) ). Action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Petitions and proposed orders under CCP 473 ( b ) amended effective January 1,.! 669, 679. responses to discovery requests waive all objections, you find! If papers are served by personal service, service must be lodged ) parties shall Submit and! Procedures for petitions for Writs of administrative mandamus filed against State of California - Joaquin. The actions undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and SFPKOA make efforts. Been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses THABITI HAYES, ) Case:! Any such argument related to the seventh, eight, and thus the records and sought. Select `` I Agree '', Enter your Case Number and select `` Agree! See Department rules regarding virtual hearings, as well as virtual Hearing instructions, please. )..! Suite 200 Stockton, san francisco superior court law and motion 95202 predominantly seeking attorneys interested in assisting incarcerated individuals their. California licensing agencies are heard in Sacramento COUNTY Superior 919, 933 ; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct party to... Weighing the privacy right at issue Francisco the records and information, directly issue! Conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference, 20 Cal.3d 859-862 Cal.App.4th 919, 933 ; also. Have made no showing that this properly applies be disclosed if essential to a different.. Run from September 14, 2022 through October 28, 2022 ( see CCP 430.10 ( ). However, in the context of supplemental responses, Plaintiffs have made no showing that properly. Terminating sanctions is not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473 ( b ) amended effective January,! 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288 Court offers online access to tentative Rulings for Civil and FAMILY Law.... 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming Court.